User talk:10X Kamehameha

Welcome!
Congratulations on starting Sanjuro Wiki! It's a brand new project, so it needs a lot of love. Here are five tips to make your wiki great.


 * It's all yours right now -- enjoy it! Once your wiki takes off, lots of people will read what you write. Right now, nobody's looking over your shoulder yet, so feel free to try things out and make mistakes.


 * Make lots of short pages! The hardest thing about writing is looking at a blank page and not knowing where to start. It's a lot easier once you write down your first couple sentences. So take a deep breath, and jump in -- make ten really short pages, one right after another. Once you've started, you can build the pages up slowly, adding a little bit at a time.


 * Link your pages together! Links help you and your readers get from one page to another, so whenever you mention the subject of another page, use the "Add a Link" button to make a link to that page. You should also use the front page to link to all of the most important pages on your wiki. Describe what your wiki is about on the main page, and include links to help your readers find their way around.


 * Add pictures! A well-chosen picture can make a bland wiki page come to life. When you're writing a page, use the "Add a Picture" button to upload a picture from your computer onto the page.


 * When you're ready -- tell your friends! Once you've started a bunch of pages, linked them together and added some pictures, you'll be ready to start showing off your wiki to the world. You probably know people who are interested in the same thing that you are, so tell your friends to check out your new site. Those are your first readers and potential contributors, so give them lots of encouragement.

A good way to stay up-to-date with the latest news and events around Wikia is to visit our Staff blog. If at any time you get stuck, feel free to write to us through our contact form -- we're happy to help!

Have fun!

-- Sarah Manley


 * Thanks Sarah! 06:58, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Love this Show!!
I love this show!!

What exactly is it about? -- 16:40, September 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Lol what? It's two films and I think some books too. It's about a roaming ronin (ex-samurai) who is extremely rude and gross but has a heart of gold and is unbeatable in combat. 05:56, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Thats cool, maybe I can do some research on it and become an administrator :) And do you remember my user name from anywhere...? 16:41, September 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Lol obviously. 21:25, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Hey
About the email on DB Wiki. I am assuming it is about the Hero Mode page I created. Anyway, how do I send private emails to you? Yours did not get to me. 21:17, November 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nope, it's about trying to get your email so I can get you involved in the new chat mods discussion : ) What's your email? -10X

Request
Howdy, Tenny. I was wondering if you could give me sysop or bureaucrat rights here on Sanjuro Wiki. I enjoy this series a lot and plan on expanding this wiki a bit more. I anxiously await your answer. 01:40, June 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure! I'll make you an admin right away. 02:06, June 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Tenny! 02:26, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

Movie Question
Hello 10X. I had a question regarding the Sanjuro series, and determined that it would be best to ask here. Anyways, is Tsubaki Sanjuro (the film from 2007) a direct remake of the original film, or are there differences plot-wise? Thanks in advance. NobleTrigon 02:48, June 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * I think that plotwise it is about the same. This is just based on what I can find online though, I haven't seen the remake. 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks. NobleTrigon 18:34, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Jeangabin666
Hi! Prince Zarbon blocked me on Dragon Ball wikia because he thaught I reverted galleries to 140px, please tell him to check the edit summaries once again. I never reverted the galleries to 140px, I just removed useless white spaces. Check it yourself if you want. 00:49, July 17, 2014 (UTC)


 * You are correct sir, I've unblocked you. 01:13, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think he reblocked me. Prince Zarbon told me to not change the gallery px, I didn't change the px. But he blocked me for something he never told me not to do: galleries which contain less than 8 images don't have scrollboxes on DB wikia. I think this isn't fair. He just wanted to block appearantly . I don't think the changes I made deserved a block. 02:12, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I guess I have to wait a few time or refresh something before your unblcking become valid. Thanks you very much anyway ;) 02:34, July 17, 2014 (UTC)

Yo
I's keepin it real yo. What did I do? Ho ho ho 19:07, August 10, 2014 (UTC)

Help help help help help
10X pls, can you revert the last two edits to this forum from DB Wiki? First edit is from an apparent spambot, second is a reply to said spambot. Randomly found it when looking for a Wikia user via Google. #thanks —Super Saiyan 7 Somebody | talk | edits 22:39, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

And because I had nothing better to do, I went on a spam hunt.
 * This forum is legit, but the seventh section's header and message is entirely from a spambot—remove pls.
 * Legit as well, but the second section has a spambot message, along with a message directed to the spambot, so it'd make sense to remove both messages (and the section header of course).
 * This entire forum is from a spambot; a user added to it, but it's just regarding the spambot—nuke the page pls.
 * From a forum created by a spambot; a user renamed it to this—nuke the forum pls.
 * 1) Original title of the above linked forum; created by spambot—nuke the forum pls.
 * This page is questionably legit, but the first message to it (and its section header) is from a spambot—remove pls. #thnxagain  —Super Saiyan 7 Somebody | talk | edits


 * Done. 02:32, September 21, 2014 (UTC)

hi
hi can you unblock me from the db wiki?from king of video games 9


 * It looks like you used multiple accounts. Who blocked you? 05:18, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

King of video games 9
Kotsu blocked me


 * It looks like your current account (King of video games 9) is blocked due to you making multiple accounts. I have to assume this is true, since it's your blocked IP that is preventing you from editing as King of video games 9. 17:04, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

I have learned my lesson I will NEVER EVER create another account just get kotsu to unblock me


 * What's the name of your original account? 18:07, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

A kid dat goes to school aka huseindibba 1234


 * Please sign your posts. "A kid dat goes to school" has been globally disabled by Wikia. "huseindibba 1234" is not a username on DB Wiki. 20:53, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

That was my original account that was blocked by ssj4 vegito nearly 795 days ago


 * Please sign your posts. Do you know how? Wikia globally blocked it. We can't do anything on our site to unblock it. 21:53, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

Listen I created the king of video games 9 account december2013 and was blocked by kotsu King of video games 9

I created this account in December 2013 and kotsu blocked me. King of video games 9


 * Okay, I unblocked you. Please be sure to follow the rules, and feel free to come to me with any questions. 05:48, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

What the shadiddle, 10X?!

 * 1) I didn't impersonate ANY user(s)!
 * 2) I didn't make ANY sockpuppet(s)!
 * 3) I didn't make the image, another user did on chat a week ago did. You can tell because I haven't been on the wiki long enough to see you and Mr. Zarbon on chat at the same time (which you would need for copy/pasting parts of the image)
 * 4) I'm sorry if I offended you and was "profane." Am I allowed to come back when the block is over? Or change the block reason to correct the mistakes at least. HappyDragon (talk) 23:00, July 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * No mistakes were made on my part. You uploaded that image to our site, and went on to post it to users. You also admitted publicly on Sandubadear's talk page that you created sock puppets to create the fake screenshot. The edit summary is accurate, and will remain the same. Yes, you are welcome back to the site after the block expires. The purpose of a block is to give a user isolated time to read and reflect on the site rules. 23:27, July 18, 2015 (UTC)

dragon ball wiki
Neffyarious is ruining the wiki. Now the page has no one to undo any one's mess ups. I was the person that did that. Now I'm blocked for TWO WEEKS because he said he warned me but i didn't get a warning. The wiki is going down hill now. Will you please unblock me or get Neffyarious to unblock me? He is not fit for an administrator Meshack (talk) 18:53, October 25, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll take a look. It would help me if you said what edits you're talking about. 06:03, October 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * It looks like you have a tendency to edit war before attempting discussion, and you were purposely antagonizing Neffyarious. You've done the same thing to me, saying an edit or comment is bad without saying why or offering another opinion. He warned you about edit warning on your talk page in September: http://dragonball.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Meshack#Warning In the future, I suggest using article talk pages to discuss issues, rather than simply edit warring and leaving nasty edit summaries. 06:23, October 26, 2015 (UTC)

I blanked articles? I don't think I ever did that but If I did, it was an accident or I didn't mean to. What Neffyarious was adding wasn't necessary to the Potential Unleashed page, random stuff like names for gohan and stuff like that. That was the things i removed because he didn't matter. Plus, he changed the names of the Battlle of Gods and Resurrection F pages. He said Kanzenshuu and Dragon Ball Heroes used Beerus and Golden Frieza sagas which they never did. I don't know about Dragon Ball Heroes but those are video games sagas. They don't correlate with the anime. I was changing those back and I even told him Kanzenshuu never used that. People were adding speculation to the articles and I was removing that, even telling them it was speculation, saying that the wikia is not for speculation. Lstly, that warning was in September, that has nothing to do with Saturday.

If I don't get back on the wiki before Nov 7, the wiki is literally going to be even more unreliable than it is now. Meshack (talk) 19:49, October 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * To reply on your Goku not being able to sense god ki and all, Goku and Vegeta both have a God form, which possesses god ki. They themselves don't have it, it's only exclusive to the form. If they did have god ki, they would be able to sense at least Beerus because Whis has a different ki. You said Goku isn't using 100% of his god ki, then why didn't he use 100% of when he wanted to train. That part didn't make sense. He tells Beerus he can't sense his ki because... he doesn't have it in his base... Meshack (talk) 20:00, October 26, 2015 (UTC)


 * FYI, I'm not going to reply about here about article talk page discussion on DB Wiki. You can contribute when your block expires. As for the block, I understand that you have reasons to undo edits, but you should be discussing those issues, not edit warring. 22:29, October 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * one more thing. Don't you think two weeks is too much for my first block? Can you have me unblock on Sunday, Nov 1 or Nov 2? talk with neff about it. 2 WEEKS is too much Meshack (talk) 22:06, October 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'm standing behind the admin team. 04:30, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

DB Wiki
Before you blocked me, I was going to give on the super and movies argument. Also, don't see why I was blocked. I didn't know who was re-adding it so I didn't know who to discuss it with. I just kept seeing it pop up. Plus, Bulma didn't say her age in Super, it was said in Battle of Gods which is NOT Super. Will you please undo my block because I didn't know who was undoing so I didn't know who to discuss it with? Meshack (talk) 00:04, March 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, the user Dawei_aw is using foul language that is not allowed on Hit's page. Meshack (talk) 20:18, March 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't believe you. You have done this multiple times, and you were a part of the talk page discussion on it. You also just gave your reason for undoing it, so that kills your statement about not realizing what you were doing. You knew exactly what you were doing, and it's against the rules. You will remain blocked for 2 weeks. 15:11, March 25, 2016 (UTC)

May I please, get off the ban today? I've learned my lesson this time and I won't remove without discussing and I will handle things more professionally. That's the truth Meshack (talk) 00:46, April 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay. Thanks for the honest effort and welcome back. 00:51, April 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes! Thanks! I won't disappoint this time around. "Believe it!" Meshack (talk) 00:53, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

10X YOU SERIOUSLY BLCOKED ME AGAIN!?! I DIDN'T START THE EDIT WAR, NIKON DID. HIS ARUGUEMENT WAS NOT EVEN VALID. I UNDID HIS EDITS BECAUSE HE ALWAYS EDIT WARS WITH ME FOR NO GOOD FUCKING REAASON. THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THAT EDIT AND HE JUST REMOVED IT. I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW YOU DON'T FUCKING SEE IT. THIS DB WIKI IS LITERALLY TRASH WITHOUT ME THERE. PLEASE UNBLOCK Meshack (talk) 03:02, April 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * Swearing and shouting in all caps isn't sending me a message that you're a level-headed editor and a victim of circumstance. You made an edit, and another user undid it. Then you both did the same thing 6 more times on a major page within a few hours. To get technical about who "started the edit war", you did by being the first to make the same edit 3 times within 24 hours. Neither of you used the article talk page. Further, the convention (which is stated on the Rules page) is to leave the article as it was before the disputed edit while discussion takes place on the talk page. Nikon23 could have claimed he was trying to enforce that, except he never tried to use the talk page, said he was trying to stop an edit war, or really did anything other than push an opinion by force. He's blocked too. 03:19, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the caps and swearing but I was trying to protect my edit from getting removed for no good reason. His arguement was "the link is already there" that isn't a good arguement to remove someone's edit. I told several times to atop but he kept going for some unknown reason. I did stop until Neffyarious said it was okay for the edit to be there. Meshack (talk) 03:27, April 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * I didn't intend on getting banned again, I even told you I would get better at dealing with people that have no idea what they're talking about. You probably won't trust me after this so, since I'm banned, and you have no plans to unblock us and forget that situation happened, I am done with the Dragon Ball Wiki. I'm just letting you know, without me, the wiki will be trash again Meshack (talk) 03:31, April 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * He said many things, such as "gt was not a side story", "this reference was already mentioned already. And gt is not a side story. It was mentioned bu akira toriyama as a 'grand side story'", "This link is already on here in the toriyama's involvement and canon debate section", "the Link is in the canon debate section", and "The same link is already in the toriyama's involvement and canon debate section. No point in adding the same link twice". YonedgeHp said "GT is a major Grand Side Story,stop edit warring again please". You chose to make your same edit over and over without using talk, which you know is against the rules since another admin blocked you for the same thing before. Your repeated unwillingness to consider the opinions of others and have a civilized discussion means you have lost editing privileges for a month. 04:10, April 11, 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I know I'm banned from the wiki right now but I have a suggestion. In the infobox, we add their occupation, date of death, etc. Can we remove information from the infobox that is only in video games? Like in Dragon Ball Online, Dr. Gero is part of the Red Pants Army but that never happened in the series. I think the infobox should be only about the series and not video game and series. Meshack (talk) 19:42, April 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * Let's chat about this when you're unblocked on DB Wiki. 23:33, April 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright Meshack (talk) 02:39, April 19, 2016 (UTC)

C'mon 10X. I know I was banned but I did it for a very good reason. Please do not have me blocked for three MORE months. I love helping out the wiki. It's literally the only i do and i enjoy doing that. You're basically taking it away from me now. This is one of the things I enjoy doing the most. PLEASE dont have me blocked for three more months Meshack (talk) 03:05, May 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * I know you do love helping out the Wiki, but you're doing it the wrong way and it's hurting the Wiki. You have a pattern of breaking the rules when you get frustrated, and your sockpuppet reinforces my perception of this. If you made arguments within the rules, you would be a great force of improvement for the site. But edit warring tries to overcome civil discussion with a contest to see who can persistently click "revert" the most. Waiting a month after a consensus to restore the page and hope no one notices does the same thing. Harassment drives away good editors who have value to add but don't find personal attacks against them worth the fun the site would be for them otherwise. Creating a sockpuppet shows that you do not understand those lessons yet, and you are not willing to try and learn them.


 * If you truly want to make a positive difference (which matters at least as much as simple having a fun time editing), you need to show you understand all of those lessons. Blocks are not meant to punish, but to give you time to reflect on what you did, and decide whether to follow the rules and come back, or if you can't follow the rules and should find another activity instead. Creating the sockpuppet means you can't do any of that. I'm barely "blocking you again", since you didn't serve 2 months worth of blocks you previously earned. If you served the shorter blocks out, you wouldn't be in this position. This longer block is a result of your own actions, and if I didn't give it to you it would be a disservice to the articles, the community, and your growth as an editor. 03:24, May 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * (Responding to some of the edit you made after I starting responding to the first piece). I understand that you like editing a lot, but that's not enough. If you ignore the community rules and actively circumvent policies put in place to protect users and increase article quality, then you're hurting more than helping. The site quality comes first. You are welcome back after your block expires. You can practice editing, respecting other editors, following local site rules, and using civil discussion rather than edit wars on many other Wikis until then. 03:29, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

You editted while I was editting a huge paragraph so this one is shorter. I understand the rules of the wiki. I understand edit warring is wrong and I should follow the rules but if someone can undo a legitimate edit, I have to keep it up (not necessarily edit war but try to keep it in the article.) There are rarely admins on the wiki because of your personal lives. There no admins to supervise the situation and it takes days for you or Neff to respond. I had to use my other account to continue doing what I do while my main was banned Meshack (talk) 03:39, May 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * -_- Are you serious? Besides me edit warring with nonsensical people, I'm the est editor on the Dragon Ball Wiki. I contribute more than people who've been around for years Meshack (talk) 04:15, May 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * Editing a lot doesn't equate to quality. And breaking the rules means you're not doing it right. 05:04, May 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * I literally made the wiki more consistent than it ever was. I made it easier to find information. Helped removed inaccurate information. Added summaries. Added pages. 14000 EDITS OF MAKING THE WIKI BETTER AND I GET BANNED 5 TIMES Meshack (talk) 06:31, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

On the wiki, Neffyarious amd Goku20 are going against the Manual of Style. While I was under SSGKakarotto, I removed the "==Film appearances==" section because in the Manual of Style, it doesn't say that but it has Series and Films under Biography. The two of them are literally are going agaist it. I talked to Neff about it but he said talk to you about Meshack (talk) 15:19, May 8, 2016 (UTC)


 * You can't edit the Wiki while you're blocked. You can participate in this discussion when you get back. 20:22, May 8, 2016 (UTC)

I feel as though my block is too long Meshack (talk) 16:18, May 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * You only have yourself to blame for cheating your way out of 2 months of previous blocks then continuing to break the rules. 01:02, May 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * Well, you gave me three months instead of two months Meshack (talk) 12:16, May 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes because you broke another rule by sockpuppeting. You get extra time for breaking that rule, not just a second attempt at doing the first sets. 00:59, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

What is "sockpuppeting"? How can I get banned for something I don't know what it is? I really wish I was't banned Meshack (talk) 00:05, May 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * Sockpulleting is when you make a second account to edit from maliciously. Some people do it to cheat their way out of a block like you did. Others use it to vote in polls multiple times or comment on a talk page as several people to fake a consensus in their favor. 03:01, May 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * I did't even know sockpuppetting was a thing. There should be leeway because I didn't know Meshack (talk) 03:56, May 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * C'mon 10X, please. There was no need for Nikon to undo my edits but he insisted and continued to undo my edit, which he claimed had to do with canon but that wasn't my intention. I didn't even know what a sock was. Wikia just let me create a new account so I did because things gets finished when I'm on the wiki. Now, the wiki is teríble. I know the rules of the wiki and I don't need time to reflect on what happened. C'mon, 10X Meshack (talk) 12:15, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

You're not ready to come back. I can tell by what you're posting here. Wait it out. 22:59, May 25, 2016 (UTC)

Url
Hello. I have a request. There is a url you have redirected to your wiki and it is: http://dbz.wikia.com. I am asking if you would give up this url so it can be freed to me (given permission by wikia) Meshack (talk) 02:09, April 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * No. That URL is being put to good use as an important and useful redirect to The Dragon Ball Wiki. 03:14, April 12, 2016 (UTC)

I'm finished...
...with the sock accounts. I am not doing that ever again and I promised the Wikia Staff I wouldn't do it again either. Plus I deleted the sock accounts I had proving so. I am actually willing to wait for an unblock. I know you blocked me infinitely but I want to discuss this and work it out. I just realy want to edit on the Dragon Ball wiki, especiallywith the new Future Trunks arc. Meshack (talk) 00:59, June 12, 2016 (UTC)

Please don't ignore me - Meshack


 * This site is not a place to discuss DB Wiki. 06:50, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

Where can I talk to you then? Email? Meshack (talk) 20:09, June 19, 2016 (UTC)


 * You are blocked from DB Wiki after many infractions. You can talk to me about other wikis on those wikis. 01:15, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

How am I able to do so if I'm blocked? Meshack (talk) 02:02, June 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * You cannot when you are blocked. 02:43, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

Hey. Sorry to bother you again, but this is like the only way I know to contact you. I want to know what the situation is on my block. It's has been 2 months now and I want to know what's up Meshack (talk) 00:26, August 7, 2016 (UTC)

You are still infinitely blocked. You skipped out on 3 months of blocks, so expect to be blocked for at least that long plus time for the sockpuppeting violation itself. 04:54, August 8, 2016 (UTC)

How long are the sockpuppet infringements? Meshack (talk) 15:23, August 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * Generally each time you get blocked it's a little longer than the last time. 04:02, August 13, 2016 (UTC)

Okay. So 2 weeks or 2 months? Meshack (talk) 20:00, August 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * We'll see. Your block is currently infinite. 17:16, August 14, 2016 (UTC)

I just wana say that ever since I've been blocked, I've learned to talk things out more because without talking it out, nothing could get done on the wiki. Being on the One Piece Wiki forces you to talk things out because everything there is so organized and structured and there're are no favoritism for a certain dub so a lot of things are easier. I also wanna say, kinda weird to say, but thanks for the block... Meshack (talk) 04:25, August 21, 2016 (UTC)

Please remove Neffyarious from moderation
Hello 10X, as you may have noticed, I am Bargeta from Dragon Ball wiki. You may remember that it was occurring an edit war on Super Saiyan 3 page. Well, it all ends with Neffyarious blocking me for two weeks. The problem is... I was right. I asked on Kanzenshuu forum for the correct information and they confirmed that what I was adding was correct (thus Neffyarious information being wrong). You can see for yourself by clicking in the following link: http://www.kanzenshuu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&p=1155056#p1155056 In case you don't understand this situation, Neffyarious was treating "Super Saiyan 3 Majin Vegeta" as a "corrupted form" for Vegeta, in other words, a new transformation. Which is not the case, but as you can see on Kanzenshuu forum, it is not a new form, the "Hakaio" stands for the fact that Vegeta is in his Majin state, and the Super Saiyan 3 kanjis are normal, they do not specify anything, that is, it is a regular Super Saiyan 3, not a "corrupted form" as Neffyarious added in the Super Saiyan 3 article.

And as I said on your talk page, this is not his first time he creates an information out of nothing. He did the same for Super Saiyan 2's article (with his "Super Saiyan 2 Third Grade enhanced form", and a false transformation for Demigra too), in other words, he created false information three times, and even with me providing source and proof that I am right, he continued to edit out my correct information in order to keep his false one. So please, removing him from the moderation, he does not deserve it. He adds false information constantly. And please, I was blocked unfairly (as you can see, I was right on my edit), so please remove my block. Bargeta (talk) 08:22, September 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * Kansenshuu is a fan forum, those users have no more weight than ours. He never said it was a new form, he only used the word "corrupted". If you came up with better wording and discussed it things would be fine, but instead you edit warred and tried to change the page back repeatedly despite not reaching a consensus. 01:37, September 22, 2016 (UTC)

Yes they have. It's because of them that most of the correct information are here. Kanzenshuu is listed as source in many articles. Dimissing them just shows how a pathetic man one can be. The word "corrupted" creates another version! It is just like "Super Saiyan" and "Legendary Super Saiyan". You're an adult, you should know this simple matter. And he used my source to proof his false one, that is why I removed it.

And if you see the history, you'll see that I reworded, I added "Majin Vegeta also attained Super Saiyan 3", but Neffyarious was the one keeping removing this correct information. Do not dare try to protect him even though I'm showing you proofs that he creates false information, even though you saw him created "Super Saiyan 2 Third Grade"... He just stopped because you spoke your vision about it, otherwise he would keep edit warring with me. Bargeta (talk) 02:40, September 22, 2016 (UTC)


 * Who did I dismiss? Who is pathetic? I can't understand your half-sentences. Proofread what you write a little. 00:43, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

Dude, whatever, this is not the issue. The issue here is that Neffyarious created multiples false information and he must be punished by that. Everyone that knows about Dragon Ball Heroes knows I was right, there is not such thing as "corrupted Super Saiyan 3", not even an alternated version or whatever. Bargeta (talk) 03:03, September 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * He used the adjective "corrupted" to describe Majin, which is accurate. He offered to discuss it and you edit warred instead so he had to block you. There is nothing left to discuss. This convo is detrimental to the purpose of the block, which is giving you time off to consider the rules. We can talk more when your block ends. Thanks. 01:20, September 26, 2016 (UTC)

No, it is not accurate, Vegeta as Majin is not a corrupted state. Jesus Christ, now I know why wiki is so bad, its moderators doesn't know a thing Dragon Ball. And it seems they like to live up to their bad reputation. In Super Saiyan 3 it is written "Vegeta possess a second version of the form", this creates another version, a version that doesn't exist. But fuck it. I just feel bad that Dragon Ball commuinity has a wiki that is so badly, poorly managed. Bargeta (talk) 15:02, September 26, 2016 (UTC)

A new start
I'm RG and nope I'm not coming for any argument, I simply come in peace, I have been discussing with chidori and stuff and I see that I misshandled a couple of things in general, in all the arguments we had.

So the message that follows is my apology, for the shity behavior that got me blocked and an explanation of my side of our arguments, basically where I come from.

I hope it's enough, please read the whole thing it's a little long:

''So we kind of got in the wrong foot with the whole active users argument, we went back and forth missing some points along. All I wanted to say was that the statistic wasn't an accurate presentation of how many active users were active at the same time. But I guess we kind of had gone to a few bad discussions even before that, you thinking that I didn't listen your advices about my discussions with other users ect and in Dragon Ball E discussion, in which what annoyed me was that you were trying to get a wiki in which I worked my ass off deleted. Then when you blocked me I was just trying to talk to you, you didn't want to listen to me, or didn't think much of my points, but my point was and I should have said that instead, is that arguing shouldn't be a reason to block me, unless I specifally harassed you. Then when I tried to contact you through e-mails, other wikis( I admit that was kind of overboard, not really helping my case) and you expanded my block for things,that I said outside the wiki, I felt even more wronged and when I agreed to not argue with you anymore( and when I said it I was only refering to you, not about other, seeing are you really didn't want to discuss) and also kind of censored, since arguing is basically two people sharing their different opinion, there is not any inherit mallice, in such a thing. Anyhow when we disgussed about bob logical, I tried to explain to you that those 3 words that I used at the time weren't insults and in the same comment and anyhow to explain you that bob logical was pestering at the time and in that context it wasn't a harassment, that was my point, I simply then said what you wanted to hear seeing as the situation wouldn't get resolved '' ''which leads to today, I realize that those comments I made that lead to my block, were pointless and to be honest I felt kind of done with the wiki so I said those things, weren't really something I would say in earnest and if I wanted to talk about those other incidents that ocurred in 2013 and 2014, I should have done at the time and it was pointless to do that now(you know those months ago), but on a side note the userpage message was there fro a while befoer you made that comment and the way I worded it was hostile, I simply should have said that I don't think you're a good admin and be done, the rest I said to you was uncalled for and I apologize for thar So seeing as those events are old( I simply wanted to show you my point of view, which is what I should have done in the first place). What I want to say is, can we put those things besides and make a new turn, new page, without anyone getting on anyones nerves and quite a few time has passed since my block, so it's obvious I have been punished for that, but the judgment remains yours''

So closing in, this is my apology and my two cents.Red Cyclone Fest (talk) 02:17, October 9, 2016 (UTC)

Meshack
Will you please stop messaging me? Thanks Meshack (talk) 20:43, November 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * You broke rules by creating another sockpuppet on DB Wiki. Stop breaking rules on wikia sites and admins won't leave notes on your talk pages explaining the rules to you. 03:53, November 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * Stop messaging me and remove my summaries. My possession and I want them for my wiki Meshack (talk) 04:01, November 18, 2016 (UTC)

You already asked the other admins, but I'll reiterate all contributions to wikia sites are wikia property, not yours. If you want to stop receiving replies from an admin on wikia including myself, then don't break rules on their wikia sites or message them. Doing those things is asking for a reply. 04:22, November 18, 2016 (UTC)

Hello
hello :). Please respond Meshack (talk) 23:07, November 30, 2016 (UTC)


 * Two weeks ago you told me not to talk to you. 05:07, December 1, 2016 (UTC)


 * I've been kinda a dick recently have I? Sorry about that. I just wanted my work to be removed because after all I've done for the DB Wiki, i felt like I've been used Meshack (talk) 21:14, December 1, 2016 (UTC)

I answered above. Wikia owns all of everyone's contributions, and only agrees to give us credit via article history. Removing your edits would be destroying Wikia assets, in other words vandalism. I can't help. 02:21, December 2, 2016 (UTC)


 * Well, whatever. I just took the content anyway and revised it. I just wanted to say hello. Meshack (talk) 20:39, December 2, 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I have a question. Meshack (talk) 21:23, December 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes? 00:34, December 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * I know you left a message on my wiki about it but why am I blocked again? Please shorten what you said Meshack (talk) 02:09, December 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * I have another one. I wanna ask of the Dragon Ball Wiki because I just want why you don't want it. Why don't you want to use the actual names of characters? I know you don't want casuals to be confused but how would the casual viewer get confused? There would be redirects and probably there could be something in the infobox. Just why? Meshack (talk) 23:15, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

Your block details are on your talk page on the Dragon Ball Wiki. We do use "the actual names of characters," so your question doesn't make sense. Please consider contributing to a different Wiki since you were repeatedly then infinitely blocked from DB Wiki, thanks. 02:24, December 26, 2016 (UTC)


 * You're not using the actual names of the characters. With the katakana we're given, his name is spelled Freeza, not Frieza. His name is Tenshinhan not Tien Shinhan. Why is it hard to accept that? The official english translating get names wrong, especially funimation Meshack (talk) 16:04, December 27, 2016 (UTC)


 * You are wrong, not using the official names like you're suggesting would be incorrect. Please stop using this Wiki to try and influence DB Wiki, where you were blocked by multiple admins then infinite blocked. Otherwise, you will be blocked here too. You are harassing me by chasing me around several Wikis. Thank you. 05:20, December 28, 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not harassing you. I trying to discuss with you. In fact, I was not blocked by multiple admins, just you and Neffyarious which is a couple. Using official names is incorrect in fact also. I really don't care that I'm infinite blocked on the wiki. You thought I was attacking you there but I wasn't. I was not trying to start anything, just trying to get your point of view on the situation better. You're causing more drama than their needs to be. Meshack (talk) 20:14, December 28, 2016 (UTC)

You are harassing me. 2 admins = multiple admins, which you know, so stop trying to say I'm wrong about random things when you know I'm right. Using official names is correct, using your alternate ideas would be wrong. We've discussed this at length on the Wiki, so stop following me around bringing it up again. Please leave me alone and stop following me around to Wikis to complain about DB Wiki. 01:50, December 29, 2016 (UTC)

Hi
Hi I'm raging gohan, you know the guy that gave you a lot of arguments and stuff, just wanted to tell you sorry for our last encounter(long ago), I was hoping I could be more civil to you and let bygones be bygones, just wanted to say that.--TheVoid95 (talk) 21:56, October 8, 2017 (UTC)

Well seeing as you won't reply, just curious what captivated you to create a sanjuro wiki?--TheVoid95 (talk) 02:26, October 10, 2017 (UTC)


 * Well I enjoyed the films and wanted the experience of creating a new Wiki. 01:27, October 12, 2017 (UTC)

Just a heads up
So Dragon Ball wiki always had a link to Dragon Ball fanon, the thing is though DB wiki has always been a friendly wiki that encourages its editors and doesn't harass those who are blocked, but DB Fanon doesn't do those things. As you can see here: http://dragonballfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:70552 (This is how the head admin chooses to deal with a blocked user, if you take your time to read what he said, I think you'll find that there is something wrong.) and here:http://dragonballfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:70552. As you can see there's quite the hostility there and maybe it's not the best place to give a link to.--TheVoid95 (talk) 22:08, November 3, 2017 (UTC)


 * The main reason we link to that Wiki is to channel the users we get who want to create fanon. In terms of what that admin said, it’s harsh and not how I would have handled it, but that user’s user page indicated some serious issues probably worthy of a block on their own, let alone whatever else they did. 03:37, November 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * Of course I wasn't denying that the user did something block worthy, but that thread seemed more like an attack than anything. Anyhow I get that, although there are other db fanon wikis, like ultra or the lookout, anyway that's about my two cents, have a nice day.TheVoid95 (talk) 14:32, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

You can bring it up on the DB Main Page talk page if there are better options. 02:46, November 6, 2017 (UTC)